RECOMMENDATION: RESOLVE TO CONTEST APPEAL
Grounds for contesting the Appeal are as follows:
1 The proposal by reason of its layout, bulk and siting in relation to neighbouring residential dwellings constitutes an unsatisfactory and cramped form of backland development, seriously detrimental to the residential amenities which the occupiers of neighbouring properties might reasonable expect to continue to enjoy, thereby contrary to Policies BE1 and H7 of the Unitary Development Plan, Policies 3.5 and 7.4 of the London Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework.
2 The proposal, by reason of its bulk, layout and siting, would constitute an unsatisfactory form of backland development, out of character with the pattern of development, quality and distinctiveness of the surrounding area, thereby detrimental to the visual amenities of the area and contrary to Policies BE1 and H7 of the Unitary Development Plan, Policies 3.5 and 7.4 of the London Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework.
The full documents can be viewed at the following link:- full document from Bromley Council
The appeal will now go forward to the Planning Inspector as detailed in our previous posting of the 24th July. Click the link to see all of that post which also says:-
If you have provided comments on the application to Bromley Council, these will be sent to the Planning Inspector. If you wish to make further comments, you must do this by TUESDAY 4 AUGUST by sending 3 copies to The Inspector, c/o The Planning Inspectorate, Room 319, Eagle Wing, Temple Quay House, 2 The Square, Temple Quay, Bristol, BS1 6PN or online at www.planningportal.gov.uk/appeal quoting reference APP/G5180/W/15/3049339.
Many thanks for the update. Glad it has been rejected by the Council and that they will also contest the appeal. However, in view of what happened in Leamington Close I will not hold out too much hope that the Planning Inspectorate will uphold the rejection and dismiss the appeal.
ReplyDelete